Relatives' Distress Over Coastal Erosion Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites
Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Seeking Answers and Certainty
The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”
He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”
The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.