🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an cute little “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but fiercely protective companion. Zephyr has “endless energy” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature.

Thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a closed attraction, public officials and advocacy groups.

But those most familiar with the whales say the intense debate over their future often ignores the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who work with them regularly.

After the Canadian government prevented the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the federal government pays for the upkeep of keeping them alive. The nation’s fisheries minister has refused that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and social skills suggest they are highly cognitive animals – something Kristy Burgess learned directly.

She spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a position that required building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

Burgess knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the details and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She cultivated a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting temperaments.

“One whale chose me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Both altered the way I view relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Burgess’s connection with the whales developed against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the park ascribes to natural mortality, but which campaigners say points to the poor conditions in which they were maintained.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the recent season, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand effects of the cessation. “Concrete is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being repaired. The whales are inquisitive and so they grab fragments and navigate with fragments in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The park did not comment to a inquiry, but previously stated: “The whales … get far higher quality veterinary services and 24/7 care than any person in the Britain, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was fired from the park in early March following the death of a beluga, an sick beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the park thought particulars of the incident were disclosed to the press and she was released not long after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and other caretakers in despair. She says the facility’s threat to euthanize its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any plans to euthanize even a single beluga would require “immense manpower”, vehicles and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for calls for the whales to be taken right away from the park, with its deteriorating pools and dwindling staff.

In recent months, Canada’s government official turned down a request to send the whales to China.

“To approve the proposal would have meant a perpetual situation in enclosure and a return to display for amusement,” the official stated. “As the public, we know that belugas should be in the wild, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing permit an relocation that would continue the treatment these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reveal a broader misunderstanding of the facts of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as easy as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As authorities attempt to find a resolution, proposals have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of nourishment for local populations.

A suggested refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received regulatory clearance, has been most controversial. The future facility, which includes extensive space of protected cove, is not yet built. Proponents remain positive that it could eventually represent a sustainable solution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s discussed with, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.

Others say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a feasible plan in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, leader of the plan, said the site will replicate the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|